Cursor vs Sourcegraph Cody
vs 
A detailed comparison of Cursor and Sourcegraph Cody in 2026 — features, pricing, and which tool is right for you.
| Cursor | Sourcegraph Cody | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7/5 | ★ 4.2/5 |
| Pricing type | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | $20/mo (Pro) | $9/mo |
| Category | AI Coding Assistants | AI Coding Assistants |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Key features | Chat with your entire codebase, Multi-file editing (Composer), Agent mode | Codebase-wide context understanding, Code suggestions, Q&A support |
Cursor
The "AI-first" IDE developers love
Cursor is a code editor (a VS Code fork) built around AI: chat with your codebase, edit multiple files at once, and use an autonomous agent. It's a great fit for developers who want AI to understand their entire project.
Pros- Understands full-project context
- Edits multiple files at once
- Familiar VS Code-like experience
- RAM-hungry
- Most powerful features are paywalled
Sourcegraph Cody
AI assistant that understands your entire codebase
Sourcegraph's Cody is an AI coding assistant that understands your entire codebase's context to deliver accurate code suggestions and answers.
Pros- Understands large codebases
- Supports multiple IDEs
- Free plan available
- Requires setup
- Pricing scales with usage
Cursor vs Sourcegraph Cody: Which one should you choose?
If you prioritize understands full-project context, Cursor is worth considering. Conversely, if understands large codebases matters more to you, go with Sourcegraph Cody. Both offer a free trial option, so it is best to try them out yourself before deciding.